Pricing
Start with a fixed-scope recovery pilot. Establish whether material recommendation failures exist, complete one feasible intervention, and measure the outcome before committing to ongoing monitoring.
1. Recovery Pilot — start here
What you get
- Curated high-intent shopping journeys for your category
- Repeated baseline observations
- Product claims verified against your catalog truth
- Ranked diagnostic hypotheses with owners and test plans
- One agreed intervention, prepared for implementation and tested after deployment
- Post-change re-measurement with a documented comparison design
- Working sessions with your ecommerce and product-content owners
six weeks · one market · five priority SKUs · fully credited against your first year
What it establishes: whether the failures are real, whether they matter commercially, whether someone can fix them, and whether fixing them changes anything. If the answer to any of those is no, you’ve spent $15,000 to avoid spending $54,000.
2. Ongoing plans — after a pilot
| Monitor | Recover | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,500/mo · $30k/yr | $4,500/mo · $54k/yr |
| Priority SKUs monitored | Up to 150 | Up to 500 |
| Active shopping journeys | Up to 40 | Up to 100 |
| Monitored categories | 2 | 5 |
| Markets | 1 | 3 |
| Observation schedule | Weekly | Daily |
| Runs per journey per cycle | 5 | 10 |
| Supported surfaces | All currently supported | All currently supported |
| Seats | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Product-truth history retained | 12 months | 36 months |
| Diagnostic hypotheses | ✓ | ✓ |
| Recovery tests included | — | 2 per quarter, with comparison design |
| Support | Shared | Named analyst |
3. Pricing principles
No surface gating
Adding a supported assistant doesn’t cost extra and doesn’t consume an allowance.
No per-seat fees
Your merchandiser, your PIM lead and your agency all need to see the same findings. Charging for that would defeat the purpose of routing issues to owners.
No credits
You’ll know what a month costs before it starts.
4. What would make us the wrong choice
You need brand-level share of voice reporting for a communications team. A broad visibility platform will serve you better and cost less.
You manage a small catalog with few meaningful product-comparison journeys. A recurring monitoring program may not justify its cost — a one-time audit may be enough.
Nobody on your team can change product data within a month. Measurement without the ability to act is an expensive way to feel informed.
5. FAQ
Why does this cost more than an AI visibility tracker?
Because the work is different. Prompt monitoring reports what appeared. This combines product-level measurement, catalog verification at the right merchant and moment, intervention design, and post-change testing — the responsibilities usually owned by ecommerce intelligence and digital shelf teams rather than by an SEO tool.